The Terri Schiavo Forum

The right to Self-determination ceases to exist when others make decisions for us.

Feel free to post a message.

 


Return to Website

  First
  Prev
  Reply
  Home
Next  
Last  
Search this Forum:  
Viewing Page 1 of 1 (Total Posts: 7)


Author Comment    
Nana


IP: 152.163.100.66

Nov 10, 06 - 10:29 PM
"jodi's house"

I have a copy of a document that says. 99-122086 APR-14-1999 4:10pm
PINELLAS CO BK 10478 PG 1571
Prepared by and return to:
FOX &FOX, P.A.
CORPORATE SQUARE
***** U.S. HWY 19 NORTH, SUITE ***
Clearwater, ** *****

2 Property Appraisers Parcel Identification
No: 29/28/16/61655/000/0390


WARRANTY DEED

THIS WARRANTY DEED Made the 8th day of April A.D. 1999 by ROLAND FOX, A single man and MARJORY M. DIAMOND, A single woman, whose post office address is **** Marrie Court, Clearwater **, *****, hereinafter called the GRANTOR, TO JODI ANN CENTONZE, A single woman, whose Post Office Address is **** Marrie Court, Clearwater, ** *****, hereinafter called the GRANTEE.

(Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs legal and representatives and assigns of individuals, and successors and assigns of corporations.)

WITNESSETH: That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other considerations, receipts whereof is hereby acknowledged hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys, and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz:

LOT 39, NORTHWOOD WEST, according to the Map or Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 85, pages 1 through 5, inclusive, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.

TOGETHER with all tenements, hereditament and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.

PINALLAS COUNTY FLA.
OFF. REC BK 10478 PG 1572

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.

AND the grantor hereby convenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that the said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1998.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written.

Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:

Signature of Gary A Fox Signature of Roland Fox
WITNESS, GARY A. FOX Roland Fox

Signature of Veronica Schroeder Signature of Marjory M. Diamond
Witness MARJORY M. DIAMOND

STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS

The foregoing instrurment was acknowledged before me this 8th of April, 1999 by ROLAND FOX AND MARJORY M. DIAMOND, who are personally known or who produced a driver's license as identification and who did not take an oath.

Signature of Veronica Schroeder
Notary Public


My Commission Expires: Notary seal here



There is also a DOC stamp of:

8**6/296 04/14/1999 16:10:33 SJW
01 0000000000
DED-CENTONZE
RECORDING 002 PAGES 1 $10.50
DOC STAMP-DR219 3 $1,435.00
TOTAL: $1,445.50
P CHECK AMT. TENDERED: $1,445.00
CHANGE: $.00
**= can't read

Why was the title transferred 4/8/1999? This house was built and purchased in 1995 according to mike in his book. Who is Roland Fox and Marjory M. Diamond? The name Marjory seems to keep popping up. Why was the house in their name?



mike book page 112: In 1995, "Jodi and I built a house in Oldsmar. I had money from the mal-practice award, and Jodi sold her house and the rental properties she owned. We put the new house in her name, No contracts between us, nothing. It was the best gesture I could have made."

"jodi and I built a house," "WE" put the new house in her name," Funny he didn't want the house in his name too. What was he trying to avoid by not putting the house in his name too? Since mike was still legally married to Terri wasn't he legally responsible for ANY and ALL bills Terri had? Wouldn't Terri have been part owner in the house if mike's name would have been on the house too since they were still legally married as marital property? Any and all money mike made before Terri's death was also considered marital property. Did mike put marital assets into that house? Wasn't Terri on state assistance?
Janice Sanford

justiceforterrischiavo.us/

IP: 205.188.116.8

Sep 30th, 2007 - 10:27 PM
Re: "jodi's house"

Jodi owned more than one house. The one that she and Michael Schiavo had built was the house on Warwick. And the paper work for that house was started July 2, 1993. The same month Michael says in his book that he met Jodi. But he is so forgetful. You can't hold him to nothing he says.

Tell you,Pinellas County has a lot of 'rats' who know how to hide stuff such as deeds ,and other stuff in court documents. Some of the things they do would amaze you.
James


IP: 167.75.254.253

Oct 1st, 2007 - 9:50 AM
Re: "jodi's house"

Michael said that the first house he and Jodi built for each other was in 1995. Building a house takes time, which means Michael would have had to put in the paperwork at least year may even 2 years before. It would be great if you could produce this document showing that Michael was involved in personal business deals (using his LOC money) to build a house for Jodi.

This would explain why Michael became very angry when asked if he had the personal funds to send Terri to Shanes. If Michael was wrapped up in housing business deals with his money, he certainly didn't want to use it to help Terri.

This would also go back on her personal commitments to build a house for the Schindlers in which they could live with Terri and take care of her.

Michael claimed in his book and testmony that he didn't have the money to pursue those goals.

It seems that Michael had no problem building a house for Jodi.
James


IP: 167.75.254.253

Oct 1st, 2007 - 10:25 AM
Re: "jodi's house"

If this is true, then this is very disturbing.

By the summer of 1993 only about 5 months after he recieved the money from Mal trial, Michael was doing the following things:

- Michael was using his personal funds to begin purchasing a house for him and Jodi.
- Michael was developing a serious relationship with Jodi.
- Michael's interest in Terri's recovery was essentially gone.
- Michael had placed a file in the funeral home for Terri.
- Michael had had Terri's cats destroyed.
- Michael had melted down Terri's wedding rings.
- Michale had went back of every commitment he had made to Schindlers and at the Mal Trial.

Very sweet!
Walter In FL


IP: 70.127.118.160

Oct 6th, 2007 - 8:09 PM
Re: "jodi's house"

James

I also would be great if you could prove anything.
Janice and Nana are not proof.


I like the smiles Janice and also the new format of the site.
Walter In FL


IP: 70.127.118.160

Oct 6th, 2007 - 8:13 PM
Re: "jodi's house"

Janice
I suggest the character size be increased for us old folks.
Janice Sanford

justiceforterrischiavo.us/

IP: 205.188.116.8

Oct 6th, 2007 - 9:05 PM
Re: "jodi's house"

First, Walter I hope the size of the text is better for you.

Second, what, exactly, would you like proof of?

If you don't know it by now Michael Schiavo has proved himself to be a habitual liar [ A liar that is incapable of admitting to the truth] Of course, he can't keep his stories straight he's told so many versions of the story. And you expect people to give you proof when everything about the public execution of Terri Schiavo was based on lies?

Would you like to see a copy of the court property document showing that Michael and Jodi's paperwork for the house they had built was started in 1993? It will give you something to talk about on your 'home' board.


  First
  Prev
  Reply
  Home
Next  
Last  


powered by Powered by Bravenet bravenet.com